Questions for 2005 City of Houston candidates

We asked this year's candidates for Houston City Council what they think about several transportation policy issues that affect neighborhoods. Most questions included background information. Our questions and the candidates' responses are presented in six sections:

Introduction
1. General
2. Toll road accountability
3. More transportation alternatives
4. Balancing interests within the transportation system
5. Regional transportation planning
6. Public and private interests

4. Balancing interests within the transportation system

Mobility is multi-modal. Roadways are used by cars, buses, and bicycles. Sidewalks provide access to pedestrians, wheelchairs, scooters, and transit users. Reconstruction of a single highway overpass or intersection can affect access for all of these uses.

Q4a: Would you support a policy to make sure every transportation infrastructure project within the City of Houston - regardless of the implementing agency - preserves and/or enhances the full spectrum of mobility uses, including auto, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access?

As the suburban and rural population outside the City of Houston increases, there is growing pressure to widen freeways and build new ones to allow more cars from outlying areas to access the central city. However, this approach increases traffic congestion and pollution in the central city, requires conversion of real estate into parking areas, and often requires condemning Houston homes and businesses for right of way acquisition.

Q4b: How do you believe the City of Houston should respond to these pressures?

  Q4a: Support policy to preserve/enhance all modes? Q4b: How should City respond?
Mayor
Anthony Dutrow    
Jack Terence    
Bill White (I)    
At large #1
Peter Brown

Yes.

We need to find new alternatives to widening freeways, especially in already urbanized areas (very expensive and destructive.) The City must aggressively promote more development and redevelopment within the City limits, with home and work in close proximity. Not only would this reduce congestion on area freeways, it would expand the City's tax base. The City should provide incentives for employers to expand vanpooling, "telecommuting" and flexible work hours among its employees.

Michael Griffin    
Rogelio Morales    
At large #2
Hipolito Acosta    
Jay Aiyer    
John Elford

I am in favor of a balanced approach if it includes elevated mass transit systems which will leave space for auto, pedestrian and bicycle traffic.

I am not in favor of the use of imminent domain in neighborhoods. The City should protect all the neighborhoods form this use and take a larger role in determining where new roads and mass transit systems are placed with a priority towards the preservation of our neighborhoods.

Sue Lovell

I support the concept - but I would want to make sure that in each case the mobility use is appropriate for the project.

I do not believe our city should be encouraging suburban development, period.

James B. Neal    
At large #3
Shelley Sekula-Gibbs (I)

Consideration of all modes of transportation in all city projects is a reasonable goal and City Council should support a vigorous and sincere dialogue between agencies to achieve these results.

The interests of local residents must take precedence over out of town drivers. However, with new people moving into the Houston area every day, our own population demands more mobility. Mass transit must be part of a solution in order for Houston to be a world class city.

James Partsch-Galvan    
At large #4
Ronald Green (I)

No. Inevitably these projects would conflict with each other. I would rather support an initiative to encourage complementary multi-modal projects.

I believe the City of Houston should place more emphasis on creating a balanced multi-modal transportation system. This would encourage citizens to return to the City and lessen the emphasis on expanding road construction.

At large #5
Michael Berry (I)    
Michael Stoma

Yes.

Stop, right now, in pouring tax dollars in freeway expansion and invest in a rail mass transit infrastructure.

District A
Toni Lawrence (I)    
Dennis Carter    
District B
Tommie Ruth Allen    
Angle Bush    
Felicia Galloway-Hall

Yes.

Multi-grade separated freeway construction is the only other construction option we will eventually have if population growth trends and regional behavior patterns continue. The only option seems to be to "build up" rather that "out".

Robin German-Curtis

Yes, the preservation and/or enhancement of the full spectrum of mobility uses is critical to effective implementation and long term benefits to impacted communities.

I think it is very important that we devise a plan that would allow for expanded bus service to many of these outlying areas and charge fares that would support the additional costs.

Anna Gray    
Willie J. Hunter    
Charles Ingram    
Jarvis Johnson    
District C
Anne Clutterbuck

Not necessarily.

Dealing with these competing pressures requires a balanced approach that includes input from the communities affected. Implementing Mayor White's Mobility Plan, sequencing road repairs, improving traffic management, encouraging a shift in the peak travel times, and mass transit, will go a long way in improving our area's transportation needs

Brian Cweren

In general, yes.

This is a matter that must be examined on a case-by-case basis. Condemnation should not be taken lightly.

George Hittner    
Ray Jones    
Mark Lee

Yes

The City of Houston need to be a lead participant in coordinating a regional transportation plan. Houston is quickly reaching its limit with regard to widening freeways and building new ones, our focus needs to be on reducing the total amount of cars traveling on our freeways.

Herman Litt    
Judith Siverson

The goal should be to make sure that every project preserves and/or enhances the full spectrum of mobility uses.

The City should put its best minds to work on the problem and commit itself to reducing traffic congestion and pollution. We sent men to the moon, surely, we can find ways to balance population growth and traffic.

District D
Ada Edwards (I)    
District E
Addie Wiseman (I)    
District F
Khalid Khan    
M.J. Khan (I)    
John Shike    
District G
Pam Holm (I)    
District H
Adrian Garcia (I)

Yes, this makes sense. I would like to see more bike trails serve a workforce that chooses to commute to work by bike that live close to the Central Business District.

Homeowners and neighborhoods should be given the highest consideration and respect and such projects should be done through careful planning with the affected communities and projects should take into account reasonable alternatives before continuing with standard practices.

Larry Williams    
District I
Carol Alvarado (I)    
John Parras    
Back to top

Last updated Fri Nov 4, 2005.

Citizens' Transportation Coalition: advocacy information organization forums